MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048634139

Les enfants et la vie dans la rue : un phénomène de société répandu en Afrique

2025· article· en· W7048634139 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de SherbrookeCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueUniversité de BordeauxUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsGuardianPopulationBeggingFace (sociological concept)Subsistence agricultureObstacle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In several West African societies, the customs and traditions of different population groups encourage the movement of children between related members. This is a practice which consists of having one's child entrusted to a close relative for various reasons. The child's access to a better education is generally the main reason for placing him in the care of his parents. Today we are seeing a significant change in major cities. More and more children find themselves on the streets in search of sustenance. Many, in complete separation from their guardian family, live and sleep there. In this study, we will show a change in society's view of the traditional practice of child circulation which has changed in the face of the emergence of new cultures. The practice of traditional fostering, which once provided security for children, has today become an obstacle to their education and development. Many children in large cities in West African countries are marginalized and end up on the streets in search of subsistence through begging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.026
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207