Letter to the Granville Street Church, Halifax, N.S.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
asserted, and vigorously upheld.Will the Baptists of these Provinces view this question in the light of reason, justice,andChristiancharity, and give manly and emphatic utterance to their opinion ?This is a question of no ordinary importance.I turn to the other branch of the subject, being that which now How men born to the privilege of freemen could manifest this igno- rance of, or this indifference to first principles, may well be matter of surprise ; unless, indeed, the same answer be given that I had to listen to, when at Church meetings I ventured to allude to the Rules of Evidence framed for the protection of the accused,-that the Church of Christ has nothing to do with human law,-an admirable reason, it might be, if law were urged to the prejudice of a brother on trial, but assuredly a wretched one when analogy to the law is advanced in his protection ; unless, indeed, the Divine Legislator had a less delicate sense of justice, and less consideration to guard against improvident condemnations than human law-givers !To such absurdities, and worse than absurdities, do ignorance and self-sufficiency lead men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.137 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".