The long-term chemical fate of crude oil released in the Arctic during the Baffin Island Oil Spill (BIOS) project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risks of crude oil spills occurring within the Arctic heighten as ongoing impacts of climate change have given rise to ever increasing amounts of ship traffic. The Baffin Island Oil Spill (BIOS) project was designed in 1979 to further the collective understanding regarding the fate and behaviour of crude oil within the Arctic marine environment. A series of experimentally controlled oil releases occurred in Cape Hatt, Baffin Island, NU between 1980-1982 and were left subject to natural weathering processes. The sites of the BIOS project were revisited on numerous occasions to observe the long-term fate of crude oil spilled in an otherwise pristine, remote Arctic setting; most recently during the 2019 CCGS Amundsen expedition. Bulk surface (0-2cm) and subsurface (5-10cm) sediment samples were collected from oiled backshore plots from Crude Oil Point and Bay 106 within the Z-lagoon, and from the intertidal sediments of Bay 11 within the Ragged Channel, where a surface oil slick was left to encroach onto the beach. Collected samples were analyzed for a total of 99 petroleum hydrocarbons including Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), n-alkanes, branched alkanes, alkylcycloalkanes, hopane and sterane biomarkers, and alkylbenzenes using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry. These hydrocarbon groups were detected in concentrations ranging from 0.0486 – 14.0, 1.15 - 1170, 0.224 – 51.7, 0.0643 – 16.9, 0.213 – 11.7, and 0.0171 – 8.60 mg/kg, respectively. The oiled sediments were generally observed to contain the highest concentrations of each hydrocarbon group at Crude Oil Point, followed by Bay 106, then finally Bay 11; suggesting that tidal and wave action were significant contributors to the removal of petroleum. Fourteen of the 16 US EPA priority PAHs were detected in concentrations exceeding the marine sediment quality guideline limits established by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, individually ranging from 7.00 – 640 ug/kg. The Toxic Equivalency Quotient values from these PAHs ranged from 1.40 – 270 and 1.70 – 350 ug/kg within the surface and subsurface sediments, respectively. Comparisons with available data from the 2001 BIOS revisitation indicate losses in dimethylphenanthrene and chrysene from 240000 – 1000 and 8500 – 640 ug/kg, respectively, suggesting extensive PAH weathering over the past 18 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".