MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048812955

Magnetoencephalographic investigations of human primary auditory cortex responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones

2003· dissertation· de· W7048812955 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueURN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languagede
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsMagnetoencephalographyElectrodiagnosisStimulus (psychology)Auditory cortexElectric stimulationElectrophysiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Der zeitlichen Verläufe von Sprach- oder Musikklängen enthalten Amplitudenuktuationen mit unterschiedlichen Rhythmen die Träger der Information sind. Unsere Studie liefert wertvolle neue Erkenntnisse darüber, wie und in welcher Hirnregion komplexe Töne verarbeitet werden und mit anderen Komponenten des zentralen auditorischen Kortex interagieren. Die 40 Hz SSR hat sich dabei als wertvoller Parameter bei der Erforschung von Sprachverarbeitung und Störungen des zentralen Kortex erwiesen. Ein reiner Ton, mit zwei Sinusschwingungen von 38 und 40 Hz moduliert, wird wahrgenommen als eine 2 Hz Schwankung der Lautheit und eine Rauhigkeit, die den Modulationsfrequenzen bei 40 Hz entspricht. Korrespondierende SSRs bei 2, 38 und 40 Hz wurden mit dem MEG erfasst, das die Lokalisation überlappender Quellen im primären auditorischen Kortex ermöglichte. Der allgemeinere Fall mehrfacher AM Töne mit verschiedenen Trägerfrequenzen zeigte, \ndass die Antwort auf einen AM Ton unterdrückt wird, wenn ein zweiter AM Stimulus gleichzeitig dargeboten wird. Die Ergebnisse lassen eine zentrale Generierung der 40 Hz SSR annehmen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueURN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207