MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048816162

Lynch, Thomas : poetry reading; January 25th, 1989

2012· other· en· W7048816162 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOhio Digital Resource Commons (University of Cincinnati) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryReading (process)RaptureWhite (mutation)Accident (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: \n \nAll tracks Poetry reading [complete]\n \nTrack 01\n Michael's Reply to the White Man\n \nTrack 02\n Like My Father Waking Early\n \nTrack 03\n Liberty\n \nTrack 04\n West Highland\n \nTrack 05\n A Note on the Rapture to His True Love\n \nTrack 06\n O Canada\n \nTrack 07\n The Lives of Women\n \nTrack 08\n For the Ex-Wife on the Occasion of Her Birthday\n \nTrack 09\n A Good Death Even When It Kills You\n \nTrack 10\n A Family of Fishermen\n \nTrack 11\n Tatiana\n \nTrack 12\n Skating with Heather Grace\n \nTrack 13\n from The Undertaking (prose)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.105

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhio Digital Resource Commons (University of Cincinnati)Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207