Medical Scientific Conference Kabul Afghanistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the medical system is being rebuilt in Afghanistan, many programs that are familiar in Canada, are being introduced to a new generation of Afghan physicians. One such program is the medical conference to provide continuing medical education, known as CME.A two-day medical scientific conference was held by the Armed Forces Academy of Medical Sciences (AFAMS) on 30 – 31 December 2012 in Kabul. With almost 300 attendees, the theme of the conference was efficient delivery of healthcare in Afghanistan.The conference was planned and run by an Afghan faculty, while members of the Canadian Forces provided advice. All of the presentations were made by Afghan physicians with the exception of one talk given by Major Dennis Marion of the Canadian Forces Health Services. Major Marion, a specialist in Internal Medicine, is currently posted to Edmonton, Alberta.Major Vivian McAlister, a member of Graduate Medical Education (GME) advisory team who is also a councilor of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, spoke at the end of the conference to congratulate AFAMS on the high standard of the meeting. Dr McAlister reminded specialists attending the meeting to apply for CME credits to their colleges. He then presented the Royal College speaker certificate to Dr Zabiullah Azizi of Kabul for his presentation on sepsis.Major Marion spoke on the topic of applying evidence-based medicine techniques to clinical examination. While the principles of rational clinical examination were new to many in the audience, the presentation was welcomed as the way of the future for Afghan medicine.The Canadian contribution to the NATO Training Mission – Afghanistan has been advising the Afghan National Army during the current phase of its reconstruction. The GME Advisory Team has assisted Afghan medical faculty during the process of developing curricula for training specialist physicians and surgeons in Afghanistan.The success of medical conferences such as this one held in AFAMS, bodes well for the future of academic medicine in Afghanistan. The contribution of Canada to this process was recognized by Surgeon General Mohammed Musa Wardak during his closing remarks to the conference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.108 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".