Mets' Harvey wins in return; Reds win on walk off
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mets' ace Harvey returns with win; Reds win on walk off, sweep series. One of the best pitchers in baseball played in his first game since major surgery, and couldn't have pitched much better NY Mets starter Matt Harvey pitched for the first time since he had tommy john surgery in October 2013, and went 6 innings, gave up just 4 hits and no runs while striking out 9 in his teams 6-3 win over the Washington Nationals Afterwards, manager Terry Collins talked about the importance of having someone like Matt Harvey (audio) - The Cleveland Indians took a combined no hitter into the 9th inning against the Houston Astros, but it was broken up with a 1 out home run by Jed Lowrie Trevor Bauer was the teams starter, but he was pulled after 6 innings, and three relievers helped take that no hit bid into the 9th Afterwards, Bauer was happy to get the win despite his team giving up a hit (audio) The Cincinnati Reds took advantage of an error in the 9th to pick up a 3-2 and sweep the Pittsburgh Pirates in the opening season series Outfielder Marlon Byrd hit the ball to right field, but it was bobbled and allowed Todd Frazier to score from third Afterwards, Byrd said he just wanted to make contact (audio) The Reds are 3-0 for the first time since 2011 - The Detroit Tigers topped the Minnesota Twins 7-1 to improve to 3-0 - Another team that improved to 3-0 was the KC Royals, who beat the Chicago White Sox 4-1 - It was the Texas Rangers big over the Oakland A's 10-1 - The SF Giants needed 12 innings but beat the San Diego Padres 1-0 - The Toronto Blue Jays beat the NY Yankees 6-3 despite a home run from Alex Rodriguez - And the Boston Red Sox topped the Philly Phillies 6-2 to win that series
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.781 | 0.510 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".