Mira and Cepheid Variables as Extragalactic Distance Indicators in the Optical and the Near-Infrared
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local measurements of the Hubble constant rely on extragalactic distance measurements, which are made using observations of Type Ia supernovae and certain variable stars. This dissertation focuses on two classes of variable star that are used to make distance measurements: Classical Cepheids and Mira variables.\n\nThe Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), which will be conducted at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, will return time-series data that have an ideal cadence for Mira studies. In anticipation of these data, we perform a search for Miras in the LSST photometric bands. We use archival optical and near-infrared observations of the galaxy M33 taken with the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope’s MegaCam and WIRCam instruments. We use machine learning classifiers to efficiently identify strong Mira candidates, which are visually confirmed. We also use period-luminosity relations for Miras in the Large Magellanic Cloud to identify Mira candidates in M33. We present the first empirical characterization of Miras in the LSST bands. We also recover approximately 70 percent of a sample of previously identified Miras and identify 2,916 new Mira candidates. For the first time, we find evidence for a first-overtone pulsation sequence in M33’s Miras.\n\nWe also present H-band Milky Way Cepheid light curves extracted via difference imaging from observations taken with the United Kingdom InfraRed Telecope’s Wide-Field Infrared Camera. The crowded nature of the Cepheid fields renders traditional photometric methods less effective, so we adapt and deploy a difference imaging pipeline originally written for data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. The light curves are used to derive corrections to “mean light” for random-phase Hubble Space Telescope observations. The phase corrections obtained from the H-band light curves are in good agreement with similar corrections obtained from VI light curves from the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".