MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7049062675

Modelling disjunct carnivore distributions: the case of the wolf (Canis lupus) in the Iberian Peninsula

2012· book-chapter· en· W7049062675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarnivoreCanisPeninsulaWildlifePopulationWildlife managementWildlife conservationGray wolfGeneralist and specialist species
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Description: In this book, the authors present current research in the conservation, species and management of carnivores. Topics discussed include the adaptation, impact and management of the raccoon dog in Europe; human perceptions of cougars in Canada and El Salvador; the impact on wildlife conservation of emerging protozoal tick-borne diseases of canids; mitigating conflict between humans and large carnivores in carnivore conservation; the management and conservation of wolves in the Iberian Peninsula; and factors affecting small and middle-sized carnivore occurrence and abundance in Mediterranean agricultural landscapes in Southern Portugal. Chapter summary: The gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a generalist species whose distribution was originally the widest among wild carnivores but suffered a marked regression due to human persecution during the 19th and 20th centuries. Legal protection after 1970 allowed wolves to recover significant parts of their range, including, in some cases, heavily humanized and modified landscapes. Nowadays, many wolf populations keep expanding, although the viability of many others is still at risk due to small population sizes and loss of genetic diversity. The Iberian Peninsula holds Western Europe’s largest wolf population, which is currently divided into two distinct nuclei: a large and practically continuous one spreading through most of the northern half of this region, and a smaller and subdivided one in a southern mountainous area. A distribution model based on the whole Iberian wolf distribution overlooked the southern nucleus, suggesting biogeographic differences between them. This can happen due to local adaptation events, and points to the need for caution when modelling species or populations with disjunct distributions. When we modelled both wolf nuclei separately, the southern nucleus showed indeed different environmental and biogeographical properties, with a trend towards a metapopulational structure. We discuss the implications of these models for the conservation and management of wolves in the Iberian Peninsula and of other species facing similar biogeographic situations elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it