MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7049172794

A new horizontal planar motion mechanism (PMM) for the NRC-IOT towing tank and ice tank

2011· other· en· W7049172794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTowingMechanism (biology)DynamometerPlanarMeasure (data warehouse)PropulsionScale (ratio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Planar Motion Mechanism (PMM) is an electromechanical device used to conduct manoeuvring studies and experiments on scale models of ships. A PMM moves a vessel model in exact pre-programmed patterns while resulting forces and moments are measured using a force dynamometer attached to the model. From these studies, manoeuvring derivatives can be calculated and then used to estimate or simulate motions of the full-scale vessel. In 1995, the National Research Council’s Institute for Ocean Technology (NRC-IOT) developed a PMM for its Towing Tank to measure hydrodynamic derivatives and then tried to extend the device to measuring ice-induced manoeuvring forces as part of a new research effort for icebreaking vessels. Using this device in the Ice Tank highlighted strength limitations associated with the mechanism. In 2007 Cussons Technology Ltd (CTL), of Manchester was contracted by NRC-IOT to design and fabricate a new PMM, capable of both hydrodynamic manoeuvring studies and ice manoeuvring studies. This paper describes the development and implementation processes of the PMM from initial specification to design, manufacture, test/commissioning, and finally model testing at NRC-IOT. The paper illustrates the improved performance of the new PMM, which paves the way for an expanded NRC-IOT research program related to in-ice manoeuvring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→