MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7049253844

Nestling Diet, Quality, and Post-fledging Survival: Comparing Two Species of Aerial Insectivores in a Gradient of Agricultural Intensity in Saskatchewan, Canada

2023· dissertation· en· W7049253844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsectivorePredationNest (protein structural motif)WaterfowlWetlandBarnHabitatForagingLarva
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last decades, several species of avian aerial insectivores have experienced steep declines in different regions of North America, and no single driver has been identified. Given the common reliance of aerial insectivores on flying insects, changes in spatiotemporal availability of prey abundance and quality caused by agricultural intensification have been implicated in their decline. The quality of nestling nutrition mediated by parental selection of insect prey types (aquatic versus terrestrial) can be an important determinant of offspring health and development which, in turn, can have lasting effects on future life-stages, including the post-fledging transitional period to independence. In 2020 and 2021, using a comparative approach between two sympatric species, Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) and Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), following a scale-of-effect approach, I investigated whether the intensity of agriculture was associated with parental selection of prey resources, nestling body condition and growth. Stable isotope data revealed Barn Swallows opportunistically used aquatic aerial prey resources to provision nestlings when available, whereas Tree Swallows strongly relied on aquatic-emergent prey, regardless of the availability of wetlands in the immediate area around the nest (<500 m). Although wetland cover (within 1700 m) and row-crop cover (within 500 m), showed weak but negative effects on nestling body condition of Tree and Barn Swallows, respectively, nestling quality was strongly influenced by other variables such as nest and site. Using the Motus automated telemetry technology, I tracked early post-fledging apparent survival and movements of Barn and Tree Swallows. Estimates of post-fledging survival were similar between species, declining from 88.1% and 95.5% from tagging to fledging in Barn and Tree Swallows, to an apparent daily survival of 64.1% and 59% 8 days post-fledging and 26% and 30% 14 days after fledging, respectively. Apparent survival estimates were not related to individual factors such as body condition or age at fledging. Nevertheless, I obtained evidence that shorter development time in the nest, before reaching full locomotor development, may increase post-fledging mortality in Barn Swallows. Tree Swallow fledglings left their natal areas sooner than Barn Swallows and, after fledging, were found congregating at wetlands and marshes (> 5 km). This work adds to the growing evidence that conservation of wetlands and naturalized areas within the agricultural landscape in the Prairie Pothole Region is important for breeding aerial insectivores, including Tree and Barn Swallows, and may be helping mitigate the negative effects of intensive agricultural crop production. This study also contributes to filling gaps in our understanding of swallow ecology during the post-fledging period, a poorly understood stage of their life cycle and an important demographic driver of annual population growth in songbirds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207