Nestling Diet, Quality, and Post-fledging Survival: Comparing Two Species of Aerial Insectivores in a Gradient of Agricultural Intensity in Saskatchewan, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last decades, several species of avian aerial insectivores have experienced steep declines in different regions of North America, and no single driver has been identified. Given the common reliance of aerial insectivores on flying insects, changes in spatiotemporal availability of prey abundance and quality caused by agricultural intensification have been implicated in their decline. The quality of nestling nutrition mediated by parental selection of insect prey types (aquatic versus terrestrial) can be an important determinant of offspring health and development which, in turn, can have lasting effects on future life-stages, including the post-fledging transitional period to independence. In 2020 and 2021, using a comparative approach between two sympatric species, Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) and Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), following a scale-of-effect approach, I investigated whether the intensity of agriculture was associated with parental selection of prey resources, nestling body condition and growth. Stable isotope data revealed Barn Swallows opportunistically used aquatic aerial prey resources to provision nestlings when available, whereas Tree Swallows strongly relied on aquatic-emergent prey, regardless of the availability of wetlands in the immediate area around the nest (<500 m). Although wetland cover (within 1700 m) and row-crop cover (within 500 m), showed weak but negative effects on nestling body condition of Tree and Barn Swallows, respectively, nestling quality was strongly influenced by other variables such as nest and site. Using the Motus automated telemetry technology, I tracked early post-fledging apparent survival and movements of Barn and Tree Swallows. Estimates of post-fledging survival were similar between species, declining from 88.1% and 95.5% from tagging to fledging in Barn and Tree Swallows, to an apparent daily survival of 64.1% and 59% 8 days post-fledging and 26% and 30% 14 days after fledging, respectively. Apparent survival estimates were not related to individual factors such as body condition or age at fledging. Nevertheless, I obtained evidence that shorter development time in the nest, before reaching full locomotor development, may increase post-fledging mortality in Barn Swallows. Tree Swallow fledglings left their natal areas sooner than Barn Swallows and, after fledging, were found congregating at wetlands and marshes (> 5 km). This work adds to the growing evidence that conservation of wetlands and naturalized areas within the agricultural landscape in the Prairie Pothole Region is important for breeding aerial insectivores, including Tree and Barn Swallows, and may be helping mitigate the negative effects of intensive agricultural crop production. This study also contributes to filling gaps in our understanding of swallow ecology during the post-fledging period, a poorly understood stage of their life cycle and an important demographic driver of annual population growth in songbirds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".