A Novel Data Mining Technique for Gene Identification in Time-Series Gene Expression Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a method for identifying useful patterns in gene expression time-series data. We have developed a novel data mining approach that identifies interesting patterns. The method consists of a combination of data pre-processing as well as unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. To evaluate our approach, we have analyzed three time series data sets which investigate the temporal transcriptome changes that occur during: 1) the cell cycle of budding yeast (<em>S. cerevisiae</em>) [3], 2) the epithelial to mesenchymal transition induced by Transforming Growth Factor-?1 in mouse mammary epithelial BRI-JM01 cells, and 3) the program of differentiation induced by retinoic acid in human embryonal teratocarcinoma NT-2 cells. We present the results from all of our experiments, discuss the patterns discovered through the use of our approach and briefly explain future plans and directions for improving our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it