MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7049386907

Numerical Modelling of Wind-driven Hydrodynamics in Shallow Wastewater Ponds and Coastal Estuaries

2020· dissertation· en· W7049386907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryHydrology (agriculture)Current (fluid)Waves and shallow waterPrecipitationStorm surgeWastewaterNumerical modelingStormDimensionless quantity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the world, shallow water (<5 m) environments, including ponds and estuaries, provide vital contributions to regional economies and environments. Despite their prevalence and importance, questions remain about the complex hydrodynamic processes that occur in these environments. In this thesis, two field sites, characterized by shallow depths and generally bounded by shorelines, are studied using observations and numerical modelling to improve understanding of hydrodynamics that occur in: a waste stabilization pond (WSP) in Ontario, Canada, and a back-barrier estuary in North Carolina, USA.
\n
\nWSPs are applied for wastewater treatment throughout the world. Typically, they are designed using simplified equations that may not incorporate complex hydrodynamics, and existing numerical models have lacked validation. To address this, field monitoring of water levels, current, and temperatures was used to validate a high-resolution three-dimensional Delft3D model. Hydrodynamics were primarily wind-driven, with smaller contributions from outflows, and circulation patterns were classified into four hydraulic regimes. Vertical temperature differences of up to 8.0°C over the 1.7 m depth between the surface and bed were observed during an 8-month monitoring period, inhibiting mixing through thermal stratification. Using a simulated tracer, the hydraulic retention time was ~22% shorter than predicted by design equations. A dimensionless empirical equation was developed relating the longitudinal current to wind speed, direction, and outflows, which represents an important step toward incorporating hydraulic complexity into design.
\n
\nDuring extreme storms, wind-driven changes in water levels and intense precipitation can contribute to flooding, particularly on low-lying coastal plains. To investigate the roles of rainfall and wind-driven storm surge on coastal flooding, two major 2016 storms, Tropical Storm Hermine and Hurricane Matthew were simulated using a coupled flow-wave model (Delft3D-SWAN). Results showed that different wind field inputs produced variations in coastal conditions, and that precipitation on the water surface inundated a larger area. This model was extended into a real-time forecast system, which provided generally accurate 36-hour forecasts during Hurricane Dorian, a major storm event that impacted coastal North Carolina in 2019. Collectively, these results emphasize the contributions of different processes to circulation and water levels, and provide guidance on atmospheric forcing impacts in back-barrier environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207