MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7049759255

The Hotel Ontario

2011· other· en· W7049759255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardinal Scholar (Ball State University) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismRecreationPort (circuit theory)Economic impact analysisBanquetNational parkTheme park
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project is composed of three main elements: a 200 room hotel with associated banquet and recreational facilities, a retail and restaurant complex, and a 200 boat marina. This mix was chosen to provide a source of economic recovery for an area which is presently stabilized at an ebb of economic activity.The area's economy was historically based on the tourism trade. It was developed by the railroads in the late 1800's as a resort area. Ontario Beach Park was a privately owned amusement park and hotel complex. No less than three major hotels and many minor hotels dotted the site and surroundings.People came from as far away as St. Louis to spend time at the resort. They were brought by railway, trolley, and steamboat.These functions began to ebb as a result of the introduction of the automobile. People no longer had to stay in the area for long periods of time. Along with the automobile, a series of disasterous fires early in this century virtually eradicated the resort functions of the area. Those hotels which didn't burn, soon closed down. The City of Rochester purchased the lakefront land and created a new Ontario Beach Park which was a popular park until the 1960's when lake and river pollution became so severe that swimming was forbidden. In the past seven to eight years the park has experienced an upswing in usage due to the reopening of the beach for swimming.The site itself was purchased early in this century, and the Port of Rochester was created. The area served as a Great Lakes Port until the late 70's when it was shut down due to lack of use. Now it is largely vacant except for a small percentage of the warehouse space which is leased out.The time is ripe for the addition of a facility to the area again to boost the tourism trade to the forefront. The City of Rochester has been actively promoting its excellent tourism possibilities and has recently built a convention center to help draw in more people from around the state and country. There are presently plans on the board for the addition of 675 new hotel rooms in various developments around the city. It is speculated that even more will eventually be added.The main idea behind this project is the securing of a portion of the tourist traffic for this area along with a development of a magnet to draw even more local people to the lakefront.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2670.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it