Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il existe au Québec une véritable tradition de réflexion sur la langue. Ce livre s'attache à comprendre quelles étaient les idées, les priorités, les positions et les stratégies des principaux intellectuels québécois sur la question linguistique durant une période particulièrement cruciale, soit celle de 1957-1977. La langue de papier revisite l'histoire de la langue au Québec, marquée en particulier par le projet et l'idée d'unilinguisme. Écrivains, journalistes, historiens, activistes ou linguistes tels que Jacque Ferron, Jean-Marc Léger, Michel Brunet, André d'Allemagne, Gérald Godin, André Major, Michèle Lalonde, Gaston Miron et bien d'autres comme Louis Landry et Giuseppe Turi, dont les textes ont été méconnus, voire oubliés, constituent les maillons essentiels de cercles fort hétérogènes qui ont réfléchi activement à la question. Le parcours singulier auquel nous convie Karim Larose propose des discussions stimulantes sur l'histoire intellectuelle de ces années marquantes et contribue à ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives sur la question linguistique québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".