Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yu Takeuchi is serving for JAXA since 2007 and currently working as Associate Senior Administrator at Management and Integration Department of Human Spaceflight Technology Directorate. He is also working as Researcher at the Institute of Space Law of Keio University. He received LL.M. degree from the Institute of Air and Space Law of McGill University in 2015. His main interest is in international space law inter alia the legal aspects of space traffic management and sustainable space development. He is a member of the Air Law Institute of Japan, Japanese Society of International Law, and the International Institute of Space Law (IISL). Main Works Published in English - “Toward the International Regime for Space Traffic Management -What to Fix the Current International Regulations-”, (November 5, 2014). Space Traffic Management Conference, Paper 23 (http://commons.erau.edu/stm/2014/wednesday/23). - “Regulatory Regime for Tomorrow’s Suborbital Space Flights: Point-to-point International Flights”, 56th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2013. - “Space Traffic Management as a Guiding Principle of the International Regime of Sustainable Space Activities,” 4 Journal of East Asia and International Law, 2011 - “Japanese Perspective on Legal Issues of Commercial Human Spaceflight” (co-author), 53rd Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2011 - “Legal Points at Issue about NEO Threat Response and International Cooperation” (co-author), 28th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, 2011 - “From Guideline to International Treaty for Rule of Law concerning Mitigation of Space Debris?” (co-author), 52nd Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, 2010 Main Works Published in Japanese (title translated into English) - “What is Space Traffic Management”, Vol. 46, No.9, Journal of the Japanese Institute of International Business Law, 2018. - Soichiro Kozuka & Masahiko Sato eds., Introduction of Space Law for Entrepreneur (2nd. Ed.), Yuhikaku, 2018. (co-authored) -“Challenges to International Space Law for Managing Space Traffic”, 55 Kuho (Air Law), 2014. -“Legal Points as Issues of NEO Threat Response and International Cooperation” (co-author), 3 Spaceguard Research, Japan Spaceguard Association, 2011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.139 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".