Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aus dem Inhalt: Schule und Freizeit: Beiträge auf der 2. Sitzung der Kommission "FZP" am 15.3.79 in Köln Kommission "Freizeitpädagogik": Protokoll der Sitzung am 14./15.3.79 in Köln (dieser Teil wurde nicht digitalisiert) Grundsatztagung der Kommission "Freizeitpädagogik" vom 20.-22.09.79 in der Universität Bielefeld (dieser Teil wurde nicht digitalisiert) Erziehung und Politik: Das Interesse der Politik an der Erziehung und das Interesse der Erziehung an gesellschaftlicher Zukunft (dieser Teil wurde nicht digitalisiert) Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft vom 17.-19.3.1980 in Göttingen (dieser Teil wurde nicht digitalisiert) fzp-kontrovers: Problemlose Freizeit? Zur Studienreformkommission II NW fzp-aktuell: (dieser Teil wurde nicht digitalisiert) Bericht aus Vorstandssitzungen der DGfE Deutsche Gesellschaft für Freizeit (DGF) Bundesvereinigung der Freizeitberufe European Leisure and Recreation Association (ELRA) World Leisure and Recreation Association (WLRA)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.689 | 0.556 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".