Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Seminar on Practical Theology held two sessions, each convened by Mary Ellen Sheehan of St. Michael's College of the Toronto School of Theology.In the first session, Robert Kinast of the Center for Theological Reflection in Madeira Beach, Florida, presented a paper entitled "Experiential Theology or Theology of Experience?" in which he summarized the results of his research on the use of the term experience in recent theological reflection.Kinast has worked with the U.S. bishops in their recent national church consultation on the laity prior to the 1987 Episcopal Synod.His reports concerning the consultation on the laity were published in 1987 in Origins.He has also studied and synthesized input on two other episcopal consultations, the one on priesthood prior to the 1990 Episcopal Synod and the one on women prior to the current third draft of the bishops' response to women's concerns.This work led him to observe the participants expressing the religious/theological meaning of their own lives in their own words with an integrity and authenticity that almost defied a further more technical statement in theological categorical language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.147 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".