MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051469210

Wither WTO…and EU?

2018· other· en· W7051469210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanctionsPoliticsAdministration (probate law)Action (physics)World tradeProduction (economics)Foreign policyTrade barrier
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ForumBy the time Britain finally exits the EU, or indeed seeks to reverse the process, the architecture of international trade and economy may have changed dramatically.Not only is the framework of the EU coming under acute pressure, but the unilateral action by the US administration to impose sanctions on steel and aluminium imports from Mexico, Canada, and the EU, threatens to jeopardise the longestablished integrity of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).Although the US has stated that the measures are a national security response, this has failed to assuage the concerns of both its NAFTA partners or the EU.Indeed, the response has generally been one of disbelief with many political leaders responding either immediately announcing retaliatory duties, or that they will soon do so.These are likely to be made against export products that the EU, for instance, perceives will have the maximum political impact.Moreover, the increased costs for US manufacturers as a result of the duties of 25% and 10% on steel and aluminium respectively, could have an immediate negative impact on output.Furthermore, given the specialised, high-purity of much of these exports to the US, it may prove difficult to source US-produced equivalent supply in such a short space of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2700.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207