MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051559878

Observation of the decay B [beta superscript -0]→Λ [delta subscript c superscript +]p[superscript - pi 0]

2010· other· en· W7051559878 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBranching fractionPiBranching (polymer chemistry)Invariant massColliderSystematic errorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a sample of 467×106 BB̅ pairs collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II collider at SLAC we have observed the decay B̅ 0[beta superscript -0]→Λc+p̅ π0 [delta subscript c superscript +]p[superscript - pi 0] and measured the branching fraction to be (1.94±0.17±0.14±0.50)×10[superscript -4], where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and the uncertainty on the Λc+ [delta subscript c superscript +]→pK-π+ [p kappa superscript - pi +-π+ branching fraction, respectively. We determine an upper limit of 1.5×10[superscript -6] at 90% C.L. for the product branching fraction B(B̅ [superscript 0]→Σ [sigma subscript c superscript +](2455)p̅)×B(Λ [delta subscript c superscript +]→pK-π+ [p kappa superscript- pi +]). Furthermore, we observe an enhancement at the threshold of the invariant mass of the baryon-antibaryon pair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207