MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051568731

Optical and Functional Imaging in Lung Cancer

2010· dissertation· en· W7051568731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerCancerStage (stratigraphy)LungColorectal cancerCarcinomaAdenocarcinomaIncidence (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in men and women, and is the
\nleading cause of cancer related death. In industrialized countries the mortality rate
\nof lung cancer is higher than the mortality rate of breast, colorectal and prostate
\ncancer combined 1. When lung cancer is diagnosed at an early stage patients are
\nconsidered to have the best overall survival rate 2. Unfortunately, only a minority of
\npatients is currently diagnosed at a curable stage of disease. The lack of specific
\nsymptoms at an early stage of the disease, the rapid growth of tumor cells and the
\nmetastatic behavior of lung tumors are the main reasons for a diagnosis at an
\nadvanced stage.
\nNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be divided into three major histological
\nsubtypes: squamouscell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma 3.
\nEighty-five percent of the lung cancer patients are diagnosed with NSCLC, and
\n75% of the patients are diagnosed with an incurable stage IIIB or IV disease 4, 5.
\nFifteen percent of the lung cancer patients have small-cell-lung cancer (SCLC)
\nand the 5-year survival for them is even lower than for NSCLC 6.
\nWhereas originally smoking is at the root of all types of lung cancer, the incidence
\nof lung cancer in never smokers increases 7. Smoking is most strongly linked with
\nSCLC and squamous-cell carcinoma 8, 9, although after the introduction of filter
\ncigarets an increased incidence of adenocarcinomas was observed 10. This
\nresulted in a change in ratio of adenocarcinomas-squamous cell carcinomas
\ntowards adenocarcinomas 8, 11. In some countries squamous cell carcinoma is still
\nthe most common histological type of lung cancer in male patients, e.g. France
\n(41%) and United Kingdom (40%). In other countries adenocarcinoma is the most
\ncommon type e.g. USA and Canada 12. In patients without a smoking history
\nadenocarcinoma is most common 13-16.
\nDespite new insights and improved medical treatments, lung cancer remains the
\ntype of cancer with the highest mortality. Additional studies are needed to improve
\ndetection of lung cancer in an early (pre)malignant stage to improve survival.
\nImproved pretreatment staging of lung cancer is necessary to prevent under- or
\nover treatment. Furthermore a better understanding of tumor behavior improves
\ntreatment modalities.
\nIn this introduction the histological subtypes of lung cancer, the microenvironment
\nof lung cancer and systemic treatment modalities are described. Furthermore
\nseveral imaging techniques to analyze the microenvironment of lung cancer tissue
\nare discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it