Penelopeyas o la política como arte de tejer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proponemos una suerte de genealogía de la metáfora de la política "como arte de tejer" que se utiliza hoy repetidamente sobre todo desde la militancia feminista. De acuerdo a esto último, la reconstrucción lleva a un análisis cuyo fondo no es la figura del tejido que aparece en el Político de Platón, sino Penélope, apoyándonos en lecturas que analizan cómo el tejido material era para las mujeres el sustituto de la imposibilidad de acceder al tejido simbólico -el discurso, la esfera pública-, pero a la vez, la representación de un tipo de inteligencia astuta y singular (metis). El objetivo es analizar si la política como arte de tejer representa para las mujeres una metáfora gratuita (en el sentido de impuesta arbitrariamente y naturalizada como se naturaliza el rol), una elección (que se inscribe en una histórica disputa) o una forma de cuidado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".