Offline Data-Driven Optimization: Benchmarks, Algorithms and Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Black-box model-based optimization problems, where the goal is to find a design input that maximizes an unknown objective function, are ubiquitous in a wide range of domains, such as the design of proteins, DNA sequences, aircraft, and robots. Solving model-based optimization problems typically requires actively querying the unknown objective function on design proposals, which means physically building the candidate molecule, aircraft, or robot, testing it to obtain the result. This process can be expensive and time consuming, and one might instead prefer to optimize for the best design using only the data one already has. This setting, called offline model-based optimization (MBO), poses substantial and different algorithmic challenges than more commonly studied online techniques. In this thesis, I will cover how to build benchmarks and algorithms to tackle these challenges. In particular, I will first define the offline MBO problem formally, and identify the common challenging properties associated with real-world offline MBO problems. I will then present Design-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating offline MBO methods with a suite of diverse and realistic tasks derived from real-world optimization problems. With the benchmark set up, I will describe conservative objective models (COMs), a surprisingly simple but effective method for tackling offline MBO problems. Finally, I will cover applications of offline MBO in computational chemistry and synthetic biology to demonstrate how variants of COMs can be applied to solve real-world scientific problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".