MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051901692

« Princely suburb, Armenian quarter or Christian ghetto? The urban setting of New Julfa in the Safavid Capital of Isfahan (1605-1722) ». Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée, n° 107-110, 2005, pp. 415-436.

2007· review· fr· W7051901692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Capital (architecture)ArmenianPlan (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude présente la fondation du quartier arménien de Julfā et les différents statuts qui lui furent successivement accordés tout au long du XVIIe s. Son apport original est de montrer, par une analyse proprement urbanistique, combien la fondation de ce quartier – et l’installation d’une riche élite commerciale arménienne – s’intégrait dans le plan d’ensemble élaboré par Šāh ‘Abbās I pour rompre avec les autorités traditionnelles de la ville et imposer un pouvoir autonome. Elle présente é...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207