Potential Effects of the Indo-Pacific Lionfish Invasion on the Bahamian Lobster Fishery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human-mediated introductions of species outside of their native range are becoming increasingly common and pose a significant threat to marine biodiversity (Ruiz et al. 1997, Molnar et al. 2008).When introduced species become invasive, they interfere with the ecological functioning of native communities (Grosholz 2002) and can cause ecological and economic impacts ranging from species extinction to altered industry and societal structure (Bax et al. 2003).Introduced by way of the southeastern United States, Indo-Pacific lionfishes (Pterois volitans and P. miles) have rapidly swept through the Caribbean region with the first recorded sighting in the Bahamas in 2004(Whitfield et al. 2002, Schofield 2009).They are now observed in densities far exceeding those of their native range (Green and Côté 2009) and can reduce recruitment of native fish species by up to 79% (Albins and Hixon 2008).The ecological impacts of the lionfish invasion have been the focus of most research to date, as these predatory fish consume a wide array of native fish and crustacean species (Morris and Akins 2009).Although many of these prey species are of economic importance, as of yet there has been virtually no investigation of the economic implications of the lionfish invasion.Lionfish could impact fisheries in at least three ways: i) By preying on larval and juvenile stages of species important to reef fisheries, lionfish could cause declines in recruitment to larger size classes, leading to a gradual reduction in landings.This is likely to be difficult to detect in the short term due to the relatively recent nature of the invasion.ii) Lionfish may compete with native reef predators for prey but may also compete spatially with a variety of native species for suitable shelter, and iii) Lastly, fishers anecdotally report slowing their pace when working around lionfish because of concerns over their venomous spines (E.B.H., unpublished data).Depending on the fishery and the type of gear used, lionfish in and around traps could lead to increased handling time, reducing fishing efficiency with concomitant drops in catch per unit effort and income.The main goal of this study is to examine the potential economic repercussions of this invasion by measuring its effect on the economically important spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) fishery of the Bahamas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".