Producción y reproducción de discursos sexo-generizados a través de la cultura física oficial. Consecuencias en la formación de profesionales en Educación Física en Argentina (1937-1939)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to interpret the construction of sex-gendered discourses that orbited the education of bodies and sensibilities in physical culture in Argentina by analysing the institutionalisation of Physical Education at a turning point in the discipline at the end of the 1930s. In the reformist context, the second National Institute emerged as a new establishment dedicated to professionalisation. This was a result of the creation of the General Directorate of Physical Education in 1938, which introduced structural modifications to the discipline. The educational project of physical culture in Argentina during the second quarter of the 20th century was influenced by a set of state macro-political modifications. These modifications led to a new institutional organisation of schooling processes, as noted by Puiggrós (1996), and Scharagrodsky & Southwell (2007). This change of paradigm was reflected in two state institutions that dealt with training and professional practice. In addition to reproducing practices, knowledge, and discourses that were in tension during that time, these establishments functioned as political aesthetic devices that created meanings related to sex, reproducing a bodily grammar (Galak, 2020) and contributing to the construction of sensibilities that associated specific ways of being with particular ways of doing. To achieve this, it is analysed a set of official documents, including the Boletines of the Ministry of Justice and Public Instruction (Argentina, 1938-1939) and the Registros de Clasificación, qualification notebooks used by higher education institutes to record grades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".