MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7052029672

Policy no. 16 : Institutional Research Policy

2016· other· en· W7052029672 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsProcess (computing)ContextualizationResearch policyInstitutional changePublic policyGovernment (linguistics)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research that uses theories, principles and methods to solve practical problems.Basic: Research activities that seek to develop knowledge within one or more academic disciplines.Creative: Any research activity that is an essential part of the creative process or artistic discipline that directly fosters the creation of artistic works.This research must address clear research questions, offer theoretical contextualization within the relevant fields of inquiry, present a well-considered methodological approach and lead to substantially improved insights.The research and resulting artistic works must meet peer standards of excellence and be suitable for publication, public performance or viewing.Institutional: Research conducted by the College to understand its services and profile its student population.This may include research on college practices, enrolment patterns as well as the analysis of pre-and post-CÉGEP student patterns at university and in the labour market.Pedagogical: Any research conducted to directly improve the learning environment at the College.The focus of this research is on the learning process, but includes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.119
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.231
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1190.231
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0100.016
Science and technology studies0.0130.008
Scholarly communication0.0410.019
Open science0.0130.009
Research integrity0.0670.025
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3350.308

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→