MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052053163

Post-acute rehabilitation of a patient following a left hemiarthroplasty for a pathological hip fracture

2016· other· en· W7052053163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTinetti testRehabilitationGaitBalance (ability)Psychological interventionOsteoarthritisHip fractureHip surgeryActivities of daily living
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A patient who underwent a left hip hemiarthroplasty was seen for physical therapy treatment for 9 sessions from 07/22/15 to 08/03/15 at a skilled nursing facility.All physical therapy interventions provided to the patient by a student physical therapist were supervised by a licensed physical therapist.The tests and measures used to assess the patient's condition at the initial evaluation included the following: 2 Minute Walk Test, manual muscle testing, Borg Rate of Perceived Exertion scale, Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, and the Western Ontario and the McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.The main goals for the patient were to improve strength, balance, bed mobility, transfers, and increase gait endurance and functional mobility.The main interventions used were progressive resistance training, patient education, overground gait training, task-specific training, and balance training.vi The patient improved her strength, balance, gait endurance, transfer ability, bed mobility, and functional mobility.The patient was discharged home with a home exercise program with support from her caregivers and family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge)Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207