MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7052056856

Recombinant micro-dysferlins for gene therapy of dysferlinopathies

2010· dissertation· en· W7052056856 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysferlinMyocyteC2C12TransfectionCellMuscular dystrophySkeletal muscleRecombinant DNACell culture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in the dysferlin gene cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2B. Dysferlin has been shown to be required for the calcium-dependent repair of muscle fibers following an induced membrane injury. Adeno-associated viral vectors, which are well suited for gene therapy, cannot accommodate full-length dysferlin. If this approach is to be used, only truncated forms of dysferlin, (micro-dysferlins) can be incorporated in these vectors. We hypothesize that micro-dysferlins, expressed in dysferlin deficient myoblasts, can rescue the calcium dependent repair mechanism. Four micro-dysferlins were generated and successfully expressed in C2C12 myoblasts. Primary myoblast cultures from dysferlin deficient (A/J) and wild-type (C57BL/6) were established and a scrape injury followed by a cell survival assay demonstrated that wild-type primary myoblasts have a calcium-dependent membrane repair system; whereas dysferlin deficient myoblasts do not. Attempts to express micro-dysferlin in dysferlin deficient myoblasts have yielded poor rates of transfection with conventional cationic lipids. As a result the ability of micro-dysferlins to increase cell survival in a calcium dependent manner has not been tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→