MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052081611

Population structure and microphylogeographic patterns of dolly varden (Salvelinus malma) along the Yukon North Slope

2001· dissertation· en· W7052081611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirthBiological dispersalPhilopatryGene flowGenetic structurePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the genetic relationships among closely adjacent populations of dolly varden charr, 'Salvelinus malma', to infer recent evolutionary events on the Yukon north slope. Specifically, microphylogeographic patterns were ascertained, relationships among different life history types of charr were determined, and the potential role of dispersal and philopatry on past and present gene flow was assessed. The possibility of employing genetic markers for stock discrimination and for conservation were also examined. Microsatellite and mitochondrial D-loop data on eight populations of 'S. malma' were concordant, revealing that gene flow was restricted between drainages but common among sites within drainages. Two phylogroups were observed in the Firth drainage, but the other three drainages were dominated by a single phylogroup. Furthermore, the Firth drainage contained the highest genetic diversity, while the other drainages possessed a subset of the variation found in it. These results suggest that recolonization of the Yukon north slope likely came from Alaskan populations and that the Firth drainage should receive priority for conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207