MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052121550

Predictors of Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder

2024· dissertation· en· W7052121550 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOpioid use disorderCannabisOpioidMethadonePolysubstance dependenceLegalizationFentanylOpiate Substitution Treatment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Opioid-related mortality rates have steeply risen over the past decade, simultaneous to the increased prevalence of more potent synthetic opioids such as fentanyl in the street drug supply. Many patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) also use cannabis, which has been suggested to reduce opioid use in this population. The purpose of this thesis is to gain a deeper understanding of treatment outcomes for patients with OUD since the onset of the fentanyl era and subsequent legalization of cannabis in Canada, and to evaluate the potential association of cannabis use and treatment outcomes. Methods: We used data from a large sample of patients receiving treatment (methadone or buprenorphine) for OUD from fifty-four clinical sites across Ontario, Canada between 2018 and 2023. We conducted three studies aimed at evaluating various aspects of treatment outcomes for patients with OUD. We specifically focused on the potential implications of cannabis use in these patients. Results: The main conclusions of this work include: 1) although patients on methadone are more likely to stay in treatment than those on buprenorphine, the treatment type did not affect continued non-prescribed opioid use in patients who completed 12-months of follow-up; 2) approximately half of the patients with OUD used cannabis which did not improve treatment outcomes; 3) cannabis use was associated with a heightened propensity for suicidal ideation, irrespective of the frequency of use. Conclusion: We identified several trends associated with response to treatment amongst patients using opioids in the current fentanyl era, and since the legalization of cannabis in Canada. The findings of this thesis are highly generalizable to the typical patient with OUD, and help to identify potentially higher-risk individuals who may benefit from more intensive treatment programs. Future studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of treatment outcomes for patients with OUD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207