Programmes de parentalité pour la prévention des problèmes extériorisés : efficacité du programme ÉQUIPE, prédicteurs de l’engagement des parents et stratégies d’intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Externalizing behaviour problems are among the most prevalent motives for consultation of psychosocial services and are associated with significant negative consequences. Given that parenting practices are among the most important risk and protective factors in the development of externalizing behaviour problems, several parenting programs have been developed. A preventive approach should be prioritized to maximize the benefits of these programs and limit the consequences of externalizing behaviour problems. However, recruiting parents to these programs in a prevention context remains a pervasive challenge. In addition, many professionals in Quebec have limited access to French-language resources on effective practices to manage externalizing behaviour problems, as they are typically found in manuals for evidence-based programs that require costly training. In light of this, the general objectives of this thesis are to evaluate the ÉQUIPE parenting program in a prevention context, examine the factors predicting parental refusal to participate in the prevention study evaluating this program, and to better equip professionals in their clinical practice with parents. The first thesis article is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the ÉQUIPE program in the prevention of childhood externalizing behaviour problems and to test whether the intervention's effects are explained by the improvement of parenting practices. The results suggest that program participation is associated with parents' improved ability to provide structure and set limits, as well as with enhanced child cooperation. Indirect effects of the program through parents' ability to structure and set limits were also demonstrated on child cooperation and externalizing behaviour problems. The second article aimed to evaluate whether sociodemographic characteristics, as well as other children and parent characteristics, were associated with parental refusal to participate in the RCT evaluating the ÉQUIPE program. Results show that lower perceived parental efficacy and better quality of marital relationships were associated with the refusal to participate in the RCT. Finally, the clinical chapter aimed to better equip professionals working with parents of young children displaying externalizing behaviour problems. This chapter highlights the latest knowledge of early childhood externalizing behaviour problems, assessment methods, best intervention practices for parents of children at-risk or manifesting externalizing behaviour problems, as well as the studies on the efficacy of these interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".