MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052228110

Reliability Of Quadriceps Isokinetic Endurance Test In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Comparison Of Angular Velocities

2014· other· en· W7052228110 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConstellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectrical and Electromagnetic Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationReliability (semiconductor)Quadriceps muscleIsokinetic ExerciseMuscle fatigueWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Although quadriceps isokinetic endurance tests are useful to study the mechanisms of lower limb muscle dysfunction in COPD, data on their reliability when performed at different angular velocities are still lacking in patients with COPD. Objectives: to determine and compare the test-retest reliability of quadriceps isokinetic endurance testing at two knee angular velocities in patients with COPD. Methods: After one familiarization session, 15 patients with moderate to severe COPD (age = 65 ± 1 years; FEV = 55 ± 5 % predicted) 1 performed two quadriceps isokinetic endurance tests, on two separate occasions within a 7-days interval. Quadriceps isokinetic endurance tests consisted in 30 maximal knee-extensions at angular velocities of 90°/s and 180°/s, performed in random order. Test-retest reliability was assessed for muscle endurance (muscle total work), work fatigue index (ratio of the muscle work performed during the last 10 repetitions to the work during the first 10 repetitions) and variations in dyspnea and leg fatigue Borg score from rest to end of the test. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), whereas absolute reliability was calculated from the coefficients of variation (CV) and limits of agreement expressed in % of mean difference. Results: High relative (ICC > 0.9) and absolute test-retest reliability were identified for muscle total work at both velocities. Work fatigue index was considered reliable at 90°/s but not at 180°/s (see table 1). A lower reliability was identified for dyspnea and leg fatigue scores at both angular velocities. Conclusions: In patients with COPD, isokinetic total work of the lower limb muscles was consistent and reproducible across the two velocities of contraction. However, work fatigue index was only reliable at the lower contraction velocity. Therefore, our results support the assessment of quadriceps endurance at an angular velocity of 90°/s in isokinetic endurance tests. Irrespective of angular velocity applied, reliability of dyspnea and leg fatigue perception was low, making their assessment during isokinetic endurance tests more uncertain. This abstract is funded by: Fondation JD Bégin de l'Université Laval Canadian Lung Association / Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it