MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052333448

RBC Canadian Open a huge boost for Hamilton

2024· other· en· W7052333448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtQuarter (Canadian coin)Ridiculous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The economic impact of the RBC Canadian Open in Hamilton is projected to be astounding. The inaugural \"Most Affordable Cities\" report is out and Hamilton is not on the list. Critics say Ontario has the most outdated vaccine policy. Jurors are deliberating in Donald Trump's hush money trial. Sex workers will not be a participant in a case before the Supreme Court of Canada. And Tiger-Cats GM Ed Hervey talks about roster decisions going into the 2024 CFL season.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3070.094

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207