MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052417608

Reclaiming the Prairie: Natural Resource Management at Prairie State Park

2025· article· en· W7052417608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePittsburg State University Digital Commons (Pittsburg State University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)WoodlandResource (disambiguation)EcosystemNatural resourceWoody plant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Once widespread from central Canada to Mexico, tallgrass prairie is now one of North America's most imperiled ecosystems. Historically, tallgrass prairie covered roughly 15 million acres of Missouri. Today, less than 60,000 acres remain, comprising small patches dispersed across the state. The largest of these is Prairie State Park, a 1,619 Hectare piece of tallgrass prairie in Missouri. Perhaps the most pressing issue affecting prairie ecosystems in the Great Plains is woody plant encroachment, including species such as eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), sumac (Rhus spp.), and blackberry (Rubus spp.). Eastern red cedar is particularly detrimental to native prairies because it outcompetes herbaceous species by depriving them of water, sunlight, and nutrients. Pittsburg State University students recently completed an internship where they helped revive a degraded section of Prairie State Park that was overgrown with eastern red cedar. Now in the second year of this partnership, park staff mentored the students in a variety of practical skills, including mechanical vegetation control, prescribed fire, all-terrain vehicle (ATV) use, personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols, and resource management strategies. Thanks to the combined efforts of park staff and PSU students, the degraded prairie section has been largely restored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePittsburg State University Digital Commons (Pittsburg State University)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207