The rule of law no longer exists in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Press release to state that there is no rule of Law in Canada: November 11, 2008 For Immediate Release: The Rule of Law No Longer Exists In Canada Promoted as a cornerstone of our society, ”the rule of law” has been utilized to govern citizens of Canada for many years. Through the actions of various government ministers, officials and employees, at both the Federal and Provincial levels, it can be proven that “the rule of law” no longer exists. Equality as put forth in our Charter and Bill of Rights, is a truth of the past. The authority given to our government officials to legislate and carry out their mandate of peace, order and good government is essential and based largely on “the rule of law”. When the Federal government can promote hate speech with impunity, while private citizens are often prosecuted, there becomes a double standard. Some persons seem more equal than others. As stated earlier, these actions are not exclusive to the Federal level, Provincial governments are also culpable. The Vancouver Police Department and the Attorney general Of British Columbia also seem to believe there is “no rule of law”. These agencies have used this premise to their benefit, sidestepping criminal procedure to create their desired outcomes. Documented proof is available and can be provided on request. As “the rule of law” no longer exists in Canada, I actively sell cannabis (marijuana) in public and have been doing so for sometime. Officials have been notified and to date, no criminal charges have been forthcoming. I invite you to visit myself at (WA 105 801 E 6th Ave Vancouver V5T 1L8 Please call first) between the hours (6 pm and 9 pm daily) to purchase some cannabis or to further investigate and retain proof that my claim of “no rule of law” exists at this time. Contact Bud Oracle (Klaus Kaczor) 778 329 6043 http://budoracle.blogspot.com the Proof: An email can change the world obstruction charges against Jim Chu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.034 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.081 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".