MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052462998

The self in captivity: Slavery and autobiographical rebirth in the memoirs of Osman Aga (1670-1725)

2021· dissertation· en· W7052462998 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirPersonhoodIdentity (music)Social thoughtConfessionalSelfBiographyReading (process)PoliticsSpanish Civil War
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study will attempt to place the captivity memoirs of Temevarl Osman Aa (1670-1725) within the greater literary tradition of Ottoman autobiographical writing, and to analyze his experiences in captivity with reference to the sociological condition of slavery.By analyzing the historical and social development of Ottoman autobiographical writing, the objective of this study will be to illuminate the forms of self-expression and self-definition utilized by Osman Aa as well as to uncover the motivations behind the writing of his memoirs.An indepth reading of the contents of these memoirs will be undertaken in order to situate them within their particular historical setting of war between the Ottoman and Austrian Habsburg Empires.Furthermore, the subjective experience of enslavement of an Ottoman Muslim will be addressed based on these memoirs.Essentially, this thesis will show that Osman Aa wrote his memoirs not only to insist upon the sense of personhood that he was denied by his captors but also to protect himself from the suspicions of his peers upon his return to Ottoman lands, and to show that he kept his confessional and cultural identity throughout his captivity. RsumCette tude situera les mmoires de captivit de Temevarl Osman Aa (1670-1725) dans la plus grande tradition littraire de l'criture autobiographique ottomane, et d'analyser ses expriences en captivit en rfrence la condition sociologique de l'esclavage.En analysant le dveloppement historique et social de l'criture autobiographique ottomane, l'objectif de cette tude sera d'clairer les formes d'expression de soi et la dfinition de soi utilises par Osman Aa ainsi que de dcouvrir les motivations derrire l'criture de ses mmoires.Une lecture approfondie du contenu de ces mmoires sera entreprise afin de les situer dans leur contexte historique particulier de guerre entre les empires ottoman et autrichien des Habsbourg.En outre, l'exprience subjective de l'esclavage d'un musulman ottoman sera aborde sur la base de ces mmoires.Essentiellement, cette thse montrera qu'Osman Aa a crit ses mmoires non seulement pour insister sur le sens de le statut de personne qui lui a t refus par ses ravisseurs, mais aussi pour se protger des soupons de ses pairs son retour sur les terres ottomanes, et pour montrer qu'il a gard son identit confessionnelle et culturelle tout au long de sa captivit.i

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207