MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052568711

Satellite Beyond Borders: Canada and the World in the Global Space Age

2025· dissertation· en· W7052568711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperpowerGeostationary orbitSatelliteGlobalizationCommunications satelliteIndigenousSpace AgeGlobal networkDominance (genetics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1965 to 1990, the space age brought Canadians into contact with a decolonizing and globalizing world. In this dissertation, I examine Canadian international history through the lens of satellite infrastructures. Over these decades, Canadian border-crossing engineers, earth stations, and satellites contributed to the daily work of globalization. At the same time, domestic Canadian space projects were structured by and intervened in global ideas about satellites’ uses. I present five case studies of real and proposed infrastructures – including global, domestic, and experimental satellite communications systems and “peacekeeping” satellites. From low-Earth and geostationary orbit, these spacecraft established connections between Canada and the world that contributed to an unequal world order in the 1970s and 1980s. The satellite’s-eye-view, however, also provided new tools for Canadians, including engineers, Northern communities, medical researchers, Indigenous communications societies, peace activists, and international lawyers to challenge the distribution of national and global power. While popular understandings of the space age are tied to human spaceflight, I argue that it was in the more mundane work of imagining, building, and using communications and remote sensing satellite infrastructures that a wide range of Canadians learned to see outer space and its technologies as part of their everyday lives. In the process, they entangled Earth and orbit, blurring orbital and international borders. Satellites were flexible: their use could both upend and extend colonial communications networks and superpower hegemony. But the orbital playing field was never equal. In practice, the globalization of satellite infrastructures reinforced the dominance of “space powers” from the Global North, sharply limiting democratic visions of the space age. This dissertation brings the history of technology to bear on histories of Canadian international relations, settler colonialism, peace activism, and medicine in the late twentieth century. From this perspective, I contribute to the important project of unearthing the deep roots of the space-based infrastructures on which our daily lives now depend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207