Signed and Sealed: The Rise of the Charter in Medieval Scotland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Scotland, during the Middle Ages, land was the chief source of wealth and political power. Although medieval Scots acknowledged the ancient prerogatives of the king, the exercise of effective political leadership was the preserve of a handful of noblemen who were obliged to protect the vast number of peasant men, women and children who tilled the soil. Oats and barley were grown on damp, sun-deprived fields while sheep, goats and longhorn cattle were reared on steep, craggy hillsides. Military strength was projected through the towers and fortresses that loomed over villages and fields. Ever shifting networks of allegiance enmeshed these castles from which the noblemen ruled. In times of war or political upheaval, land might be seized through conquest; in times of peace, it was gained by a grant of ownership embodied by a charter. \n\tUntil the late twelfth century, land and other privileges, fiscal and political were granted to a beneficiary in a public ceremony in which the new lord was invested with a physical symbol of the land such as a clod of earth. Borders were delineated and reaffirmed through an initial perambulation in which the lord and his retainers marched the perimeter of the new estates, thus embedding its bounds in the collective memory of locals. By 1300, the Scots, like the inhabitants of other medieval kingdoms, had developed what historians have referred to as a ‘trust in writing’. As written instruments, charters gradually replaced the public ceremonies and annual traditions as formal records of land that had exchanged hands. \n\tThough seemingly impenetrable manuscripts, charters can divulge much about Scottish families of the past. Invocation clauses reveal the local saints to whom medieval Scots prayed and the names of the loved ones whom they remembered. Some charters closely describe the lands they bestowed, noting wells, streams, hills and copses that have long since disappeared. The waxen seals that authenticated these lordly transactions are embossed with heraldry that projects the authority of (and almost always tells a story about) the grantor. And the witness lists reveal the political affinities and relationships held by local elites. \n\tThe charters on display mostly relate to lands held by the Campbell and Menzies families who governed lordships in the Western Highlands. The earliest charter (ca. 1334) lists lands granted by the Earl of Atholl to Sir Robert Menzies during the Second Scottish War of Independence (1332-57). In the centuries that followed, the Campbell and Menzies families used the power and authority inherent in their charters to increase their domination over the lands of Lochawe and Glenorchy and to legitimize their rule in the region. In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, the Campbell family, in particular, recognized the importance of legal instruments as tools to be used to assert their power. The charters in this exhibit are a testimony of their territorial ambitions and achievement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".