Reproductive performance of sows supplemented with an oil high in essential fatty acids during early gestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Linoleic and linolenic acids are involved in both implantation and central nervous system development of the embryos. By supplementing gestation diets with these essential fatty acids (FAs), it may be possible to enhance embryo survival, litter size and piglet survivability. Approximately 60 sows and gilts were used for each of 3 trials. Animals were housed on straw in groups of 14 to 16 and were fed once daily in individual feeding stalls. On day of breeding (d0) animals were randomly assigned within pen to 1 of 3 treatments; diet 1 (T1) - control (commercial dry sow), diet 2 (T2) - starch (equal energy intake to diet 3, but no supplemental fatty acids), diet 3 (T3) - oil (supplemented with flax seed oil to bring linoleic acid content to 2%). Animals were formula-fed according to body weight (BW) during gestation (1%BW + 0.7kg). The test diets were fed until day 40 of gestation, after which all animals returned to the commercial gestation ration (control). In trial 1, the younger growing animals were weaned in relatively poor body condition and older mature animals tended to be over-conditioned. For trials 2 and 3, the feeding formula was adjusted to account for body condition as well as body weight. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".