MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052652632

Seismic Analysis and Design for Enhanced Performance of Nonstructural Components in Steel Buildings

2023· dissertation· en· W7052652632 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsAccelerationDowntimeSeismic analysisReduction (mathematics)VibrationPeak ground accelerationMoment (physics)Frame (networking)Ductility (Earth science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large economic losses and downtime due to nonstructural damage in recent earthquakes have highlighted the need for improving the seismic performance of nonstructural components (NSCs). Recognizing this, many studies have focused on evaluating the seismic demands of NSCs supported on structures of various types. However, previous studies considered the supporting structure as a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system or as a simplified multi-DOF frame. More advanced nonlinear modeling techniques able to capture damage-induced deterioration must be considered to arrive at more realistic estimates of the response of various structural system types. In addition, demand estimation methods must be complemented with appropriate design procedures that enable the reduction of seismic losses associated with NSCs. The first main objective of this thesis is to better quantify the seismic demands imposed on acceleration-sensitive components mounted in steel buildings with common lateral force resisting systems, including Special Concentrically Braced Frame (SCBF) and Special Moment Frame (SMF) structures. The second main objective focuses on developing a simplified performance-based design procedure centered on NSC losses. To achieve the first objective, eleven archetypes with varying heights and vibration properties are numerically modeled using state-of-the-art validated methods. Then, the absolute floor acceleration responses are used to generate floor acceleration spectra for various NSC damping and ductility levels. The thesis presents qualitative and quantitative aspects of the NSC demands, as well as practical formulas for relevant design parameters, including the ratio of peak floor acceleration (PFA) to peak ground acceleration (PGA), and the ratio of peak component acceleration (PCA) to PFA. The thesis proceeds with using FEMA P-58 procedures to develop a simplified NSC-loss-based design approach for SCBF structures. This approach is based on NSC loss spectra that allow in-advance selection of the design base shear coefficient so that acceptable exceedance probabilities can be met for multiple loss levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207