MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052741612

The 19th Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments and Water: Abstract Book / [Co-Directors: Paul T. Kosteki, Eward J. Calabrese, Clifford Bruell, and Brian J. Rothschild]

2003· article· en· W7052741612 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryU.S. Army Corps of EngineersDivision of Ocean SciencesUniversity of Texas at El PasoEngineer Research and Development CenterCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell UniversityKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversité de BordeauxHospital for Sick ChildrenCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of TorontoWorcester Polytechnic InstituteSaint Petersburg State UniversityUniversity of South CarolinaUniversità degli Studi di CagliariU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUniversity of MissouriSyracuse UniversityBattelleUniversity of Southern CaliforniaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
KeywordsGeologistWorld heritage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental biotechnology encompasses a wide range of characterization, monitoring and control or remediation technologies that are based on biological processes.Recent breakthroughs in our understanding of biogeochemical processes are leading to exciting new and cost effective ways to monitor and manipulate the environment.Bioremediation has proven to be one of the most cost effective and environmentally sound remediation technologies available at sites where it will work.Though not a "new" technology, given that petroleum land farming is about 50 years old, there are a number of exciting and relevant technologies derived from molecular biology that have tremendous implications for the future of this branch of environmental biotechnology.This should not be all that surprising considering that microbes are the dominant life on earth (>10 30 cells and >10 17 g) and have had >3.7 billion years to evolve.Bioventing, biopiles, biofilters, bioreactors, biosparging, prepared beds, reactive barriers, and intrinsic bioremediation (natural attenuation) are all become widely used for bioremediation of soil, air, and groundwater.Emerging technologies in include, bioimmobilization, biocurtains, bioaugmentation, and treatment trains, especially as applied to mixed waste, metals, and radionuclides in the environment.Examples of various new techniques for biostimulation and bioaugmentation and their efficacy will be discussed.The possibilities for genetically modified organisms will be considered along with the reasons that they have not been used for bioremediation up until now.Monitoring techniques that inventory and monitor terminal electron acceptors and electron donors, enzyme probes that measure functional activity in the environment, functional genomic microarrays, phylogenetic microarrays, metabolomics, proteomics, and quantitative PCR are also being rapidly adapted for studies in environmental biotechnology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueScholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207