MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052788679

Time Code Formats . Blue Book. Issue 4. November 2010 - CCSDS 301.0-B-4

2010· article· en· W7052788679 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Space and Astronautical ScienceNuclear PhysicsCanadian Space AgencyIndian Space Research OrganisationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Space OrganizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationKorea Aerospace Research InstituteEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCode (set theory)Source codeData securityBasis (linear algebra)Data system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Recommendation establishes a common framework and provides a common basis for the formats of time code data.The current issue defines a second P-Field octet for the CCSDS Unsegmented Time Code (CUC) and adds a Security Section..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207