MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052811591

Spinal administration of a δ opioid receptor agonist attenuates hyperalgesia and allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain

2012· article· en· W7052811591 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Research ChairsJ.P. Bickell FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsNeuropathic painHyperalgesiaAllodyniaAgonistRat modelOpioidAnalgesic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropathic (NP) pain is a debilitating chronic pain disorder considered by some to be inherently resistant to therapy with traditional analgesics.Indeed, l opioid receptor (OR) agonists show reduced therapeutic benefit and their long term use is hindered by the high incidence of adverse effects.However, pharmacological and physiological evidence increasingly suggests a role for dOR agonists in modulating NP pain symptoms.In this study, we examined the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of the spinally administered dOR agonist, D-[Ala 2 , Glu 4 ]deltorphin II (deltorphin II), as well as the changes in dOR expression, in rats following chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve.Rats with CCI exhibited cold hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia over a 14-day testing period.Intrathecal administration of deltorphin II reversed cold hyperalgesia on day 14 and dose-dependently attenuated mechanical allodynia.The effects of deltorphin II were mediated via activation of the dOR as the effect was antagonized by cotreatment with the d-selective antagonist, naltrindole.Western blotting experiments revealed no changes in dOR protein in the dorsal spinal cord following CCI.Taken together, these data demonstrate the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effectiveness of a spinally administered dOR agonist following peripheral nerve injury and support further investigation of dORs as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of NP pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207