MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052820604

Transboundary Indigenous Oil Spill Risk and Eco-cultural Resources

2022· article· en· W7052820604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGeneral partnershipOil spillResource (disambiguation)Leverage (statistics)Stewardship (theology)Human settlementGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Strait of Juan de Fuca experiences high oil spill risk due to dense vessel traffic in the region. An oil spill in the region would cross the Canada-U.S. border, affecting Tribes, First Nations, states, and provinces. Due to the relative remoteness of these areas, Tribes and First Nations may be the first on the scene in the event of an incident. However, regulatory differences associated with the Canada-U.S. border and federal planning and response structures that were not built with indigenous governments in mind can impact effective prevention, preparedness, and response to oil spills, with particular consequences for Indigenous communities and culturally significant resources. To build capacity across borders and support collaboration among Tribes and First Nations in marine resource stewardship and oil pollution prevention, the Makah Tribal Council and Office of Marine Affairs, with participation from Nuu-Chah-Nuulth Tribes, hosted a virtual workshop on Indigenous oil spill risk and eco-cultural resources. The objectives of the workshop were to create connections among Tribes and First Nations, share information and experience, and identify opportunities to leverage past successes and build new collaborations. Key messages emerged from two days of discussions, including 1) cultural protocols can be used to build foundational relationships for collaboration, 2) watershed moments can arrive through meaningful collaboration, not only after crises, and 3) cross-pollination and partnership have advanced the ability of some Tribes and First Nations to prepare for and respond to spills. Additionally, an artist captured key elements of the discussions in graphic recordings, which added a rich layer of visual storytelling that helped to address some of the shortfalls of virtual meetings. In our presentation, we will share key takeaways from the workshop and identify potential next steps in building transboundary relationships for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207