State Regulation of the Activities of the Public Organizations in Canada and Ukrainian Activists in 1918-1939
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyses the features of Canadian internal policy on public activities of Ukrainian immigrants in the interwar period. The regulations of the Canadian legislation governing this activity are characterized. This regulation directly reflected the attitude of the country`s ruling circles towards national minorities. It was carried out within the framework of the Companies Act of 1917. All public organizations that wished to become legal had to obtain a charter from the government, i. e. official permission to expand their activities. Charters issued by the Secretary of State of Canada gave the right to found departments and indicated the territorial boundaries of the formation of societies. The article also outlines the possibilities of creation and functioning of public organizations. It is clarified whether the legislation of the country influenced the development of Ukrainian social and political associations and in what way. The activity of banned communities is investigated and the reasons why they have lost their legal character are identified. In general, there was no prejudice from the part of the Canadian authorities towards the work of Ukrainian public organizations in 1918-1939. The main condition was that their activities did not endanger the security of the country`s citizens and state regime. Ukrainian social and political associations of the interwar period were liberal, nationalist, conservative, socialist and communist. Most of them functioned without any hindrance from the Canadian government officials, and only the far-left were closely monitored by the authorities. It was because of their incitement of the population to workers` strikes, their plans to change the state regime of Canada and the desire for world revolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".