Teachers’ Pension Scheme (England and Wales) Annual Report and Accounts: For the year ended 31 March 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
14,999 6.4% 1 -25,999 7.4% 15,000 -25,999 7.2% 26,000 -34,999 8.6% 26,000 -31,999 8.3% 35,000 -41,999 9.6% 32,000 -39,999 9.5% 41,500 -54,999 10.2% 40,000 -44,999 9.9% 55,000 -74,999 11.3% 45,000 -74,999 11.0% 75,000 or more 11.7% 75,000 -99,999 11.6% 100,000 or more 12.4% 1.13 Pensions payable have also been increased by 2.7% from 7 April 2014.This is as a consequence of the cost of living increasing, based on the Consumer Price Index.Pension payments were increased by 1.2% from 6 April 2015 for 2015-16.1.14 The arrangements for a reformed TPS, in line with the remainder of the recommendations made by Lord Hutton, have now been determined and apply from financial year 2015-16 onwards.Changes to the Premature Retirement Compensation (PRC) scheme 1.15During the year, compensation payments were increased by 2.7% with effect from 7 April 2014 in line with pensions.Compensation payments were increased by 1.2% on 6 April 2015 for 2015-16.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".