Study on the measurement of soot particle size by laser induced incandescence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soot is very harmful to the human health, which has drawn increasing attention. It has been shown that the toxicity of soot is directly related to the particle size. So it is very important to develop laser-based techniques to rapidly gain soot particle size information. LII (Laser Induced Incandescence) is considered a very promising method for soot measurement, and it can be used to determine soot concentration and particle size. In this paper, LII was used to infer primary particle size of soot at different axis positions in an ethylene/air laminar coflow diffusion flame. The results were compared with those from TEM (Transmission Electron Microscope) image analysis of thermophoretically sampled soot. It was shown that, along the flame axis, the particle diameter first increases and then decreases. Comparing the LII and probe sampling results, the trends agree well but the values differ slightly. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the LII technique for soot particle sizing is found promising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it