Supplemental endowment fund : / University of Trinity College, Toronto.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The friends and supporters of Dm-Church University throughout the province will be pleased to learn that as the result of the movement begun some three years ago in its behalf, rather more than half of the $200,000, asked for by the Corporation for the development of the University, lias been secured.Canadian churchmen have given $60,000, and the recent appeal to churchmen in England has realized $f)0,000 more.Included in this latter amount is a grant of $15,000 from the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.This is made, after the custom of the Society, on the condition that some $20,000 more than is already available from Canadian and English subscriptions be raised to meet it, and the whole, or part, will lapse and be written 'off, unless the conditions arc complied with within the next four years.This fact, coupled with the urgent necessity that still exists for the better equipment of the University, has led the Corporation to decide upon the immediate re-opening of the Canadian canvass.With the strong feeling which now exists in favour of Religious Education, and the manifest influence that it must have upon the public and social morality of the country, it i^of the first
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.795 | 0.378 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".