MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052987733

Speech enhancement using a reduced complexity MFCC-based Deep Neural Network

2018· dissertation· en· W7052987733 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpeech enhancementMel-frequency cepstrumCepstrumNoise (video)Benchmark (surveying)Artificial neural networkLogarithmNoise reductionFrequency domainReduction (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to classical noise reduction methods introduced over the past decades, this work focuses on a regression-based single-channel speech enhancement framework using DNN, as recently introduced by Liu et al..While the latter framework can lead to improved speech quality compared to classical approaches, it is afflicted by high computational complexity in the training stage.The main contribution of this work is to reduce the DNN complexity by introducing a spectral feature mapping from noisy mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) to enhanced short time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrum.Leveraging MFCC not only has the advantage of mimicking the logarithmic perception of human auditory system, but this approach requires much fewer input features and consequently lead to reduced DNN complexity.Exploiting the frequency domain speech features obtained from the results of such a mapping also avoids the information loss in reconstructing the time-domain speech signal from its MFCC.While the proposed method aims to predict clean speech spectra from corrupted speech inputs, its performance is further improved by incorporating information about the noise environment into the training phase.We implemented the proposed DNN method with different numbers of MFCC and used it to enhance several different types of noisy speech files.Experimental results of perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) show that the proposed approach can outperform the benchmark algorithms including a recently proposed non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) approach, and this for various speakers and noise types, and different SNR levels.More importantly, the proposed approach with MFCC leads to a significant reduction in complexity, where the runtime is reduced by a factor of approximately five.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207